da betobet： A statistical analysis of Deccan Chargers and Chennai Super Kings ahead of their IPL semi-final
da winzada777： Madhusudhan Ramakrishnan21-Apr-2010Chennai Super Kings have been the most consistent team across all three editions of the IPL but this year, they’ve stuttered and only just managed to get to the semis. Deccan, the defending champions, were ordinary through the first half of the tournament before raising their game to win five in a row. Deccan, though, have the edge over Chennai in their head to head encounters, winning both matches in 2010 – by 31 runs in Chennai and by six wickets in Nagpur.The table below shows the performance of the two teams in both batting and bowling. It’s clear that Chennai Super Kings have clearly outperformed Deccan when we take into account the difference between the batting run-rate and the bowling economy rate.
TeamMatchesRun-rateEconomy rateRun-rate differenceChennai Super Kings148.428.170.25Deccan Chargers148.008.19-0.19During the Powerplay overs, both teams are pretty even in terms of scoring rates, but Deccan have lost more wickets, which is an indication of poor top-order performance.
TeamRuns scoredBalls facedRun-rateWickets lostAverageChennai Super Kings6755048.031935.52Deccan Chargers6655047.912625.57On the bowling front though, Deccan Chargers have performed better than Chennai with a better economy rate and a higher tally of wickets.
TeamRuns ConcededBalls bowledEconomy rateWickets takenAverageChennai Super Kings6525047.762032.60Deccan Chargers6215047.392425.87In the last six overs, there is a considerable difference in the batting performances of Chennai and Deccan. Chennai have prospered due to some excellent late hitting by M Vijay, Albie Morkel and MS Dhoni. They clearly have a better record in terms of scoring rate and batting average while Deccan’s performance has been below par towards the end of the innings.
TeamRuns scoredBalls facedRun-rateWickets lostAverageChennai Super Kings7184559.462924.75Deccan Chargers6464658.333916.56Deccan’s fast bowlers have performed much better than their Chennai counterparts. Chaminda Vaas, Ryan Harris and Harmeet Singh have shown consistency throughout the league stage. In the spin department though, the Chennai spinners R.Ashwin, Shadab Jakati and Muttiah Muralitharan have held their own, even though Deccan have the leading wicket-taker, Pragyan Ojha, in their ranks.
Type of bowlerRuns concededBalls bowledEconomy rateWickets takenAveragePace12928628.813536.20Spin9657957.013824.44
Type of bowlerRuns concededBalls bowledEconomy rateWickets takenAveragePace11828318.334923.55Spin7285447.832627.30One of the reasons for Chennai’s resurgence has been the remarkable bowling of R Ashwin, who has been extremely economical and has picked up quite a few wickets despite bowling during the Powerplay overs. Deccan, meanwhile, have been assisted ably throughout by Ojha. The performances of these two could be one of the keys to the outcome of the semi-final.
Player NameRuns concededBalls bowledEconomy rateWickets takenAverageR.Ashwin2552406.371221.25Pragyan Ojha3803067.452019.00Deccan have the advantage of having played at the DY Patil Stadium before, but their record at the ground so far is quite discouraging – played two, lost two. On both occasions, they failed in run-chases: Kolkata beat them by 11 runs in the first match of the tournament, while Mumbai comfortably defended their total of 172, winning by 41 runs. Their record at this venue isn’t the only reason they’ll prefer to bat first if they win the toss: in the six matches they’ve batted first in IPL 2010, they’ve won five times. On the other hand, they’ve only won three out of eight games chasing.Chennai’s performance, though, seems to indicate that they don’t particularly favour batting first or chasing. They have won and lost four games while batting first, and while chasing, they have won and lost three times.